Skip to main content

User account menu
Main navigation
  • Topics
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Videos/Webinars
    • All videos
    • Product Demos
    • Webinars
  • Advertise
    • Advertise
    • Submit B2B Press Release
    • Write for us
  • Metrology Hub
  • Training
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Mobile Menu
  • Home
  • Topics
    • 3D Metrology-CMSC
    • Customer Care
    • FDA Compliance
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Lean
    • Management
    • Metrology
    • Operations
    • Risk Management
    • Six Sigma
    • Standards
    • Statistics
    • Supply Chain
    • Sustainability
    • Training
  • Login / Subscribe
  • More...
    • All Features
    • All News
    • All Videos
    • Contact
    • Training

Statistically, How Thankful Should We Be? Part 2

Assessing global poverty

Jim Frost
Tue, 11/19/2013 - 17:50
  • Comment
  • RSS

Social Sharing block

  • Print
  • Add new comment
Body

In part one, I looked at how personal income levels fit into the global distribution of incomes. I’d be the last person to suggest that higher income guarantees more happiness. I’ve visited a number of developing countries, and as long as peoples’ basic needs are met, they seem to be just as happy and hard working as people here at home.

ADVERTISEMENT

So instead of personal income levels, I’d like to assess something more meaningful: global well-being. How does the overall global welfare today compare to 1970? Are more people getting their basic needs met? That’s what we’ll look at in this article, and there’s good news here.

To evaluate global well-being, I’ll assess how global poverty and income inequality have changed.

Global poverty levels from 1970 to 2006

Depending on the organization and year, there are several official poverty lines for developing countries. I’ll use the $1 a day poverty line, which equates to $312 U.S. dollars in 2006. Using the other common poverty lines (i.e., $2 and $3 a day) produces similar results.

 …

Want to continue?
Log in or create a FREE account.
Enter your username or email address
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
By logging in you agree to receive communication from Quality Digest. Privacy Policy.
Create a FREE account
Forgot My Password

Comments

Submitted by hutchis1 on Wed, 11/27/2013 - 10:39

Being Happy

Interesting article and appreciate your insight.  There is a tremedous difference in "happy" and "joy", i.e., circumstances/situational versus despite circumstances/situation and it's too bad that income is used as world's the definition of poverty, all could be rich but still poor in what really matters, "For what is a man profited, if he should gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"  Poverty is a symptom of a deeper problem with respect to mankind.  Having the opportunity to spend time in China and my home of the US we should all be very thankful.

  • Reply

Submitted by Jim Frost on Mon, 12/02/2013 - 07:10

In reply to Being Happy by hutchis1

Being Happy

I agree completely. I've been to a number of developing countries and, all in all, people in these countries seem as happy as folks at home despite differences in income. As I wrote in part 1, I wish more countries were like Bhutan in that they measure happiness and include it in their development plans. Unfortunately, it's easier and more concrete to measure something like income. Jim Frost
  • Reply

Add new comment

1 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Please login to comment.
      

© 2024 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute Inc.

footer
  • Home
  • Print QD: 1995-2008
  • Print QD: 2008-2009
  • Videos
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write for us
footer second menu
  • Subscribe to Quality Digest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us